Assetmap is beginning it's early access. Sign up for updates.

Why Social Capital Is The Coming Decade’s Most Important Buzzword

Posted February 6th, 2011 in Social Capital | View Comments ronconway

In Silicon Valley, Ron Conway is a legend. The granddaddy of the new class of “super angels,” Conway is a prolific investor who recently increased his clout by partnering with Russia’s Yury Milner to invest in literally every new Y Combinator company. But the reason Conway is one of the most sought after angel investors is not in his cash, but in the power of his network and influence, and his willingness to deploy it on behalf of his companies. Called a “human network router” by Netscape founder and newly minted venture capitalist Marc Andreessen, he reportedly keeps a notebook in which he is constantly jotting down the things his people need. In shot, he is investing his social capital alongside his financial capital.

Conway is not the only person to use his social capital to great effect. You know that person who always seems to find a way into the most premier conferences and elite gatherings? The woman on your team who always knows how to get deals done? Your friend who left her cushy job to be a self-employed consultant who is backlogged with work? That friend who, at the end of every conversation seems to have some introduction for you?

These are all masters of the 21st century’s most important currency: social capital. Deploying our social capital is a process that most of us do day in and day out, yet its something that most of us do and know intuitively, not intentionally. For a new generation of professionals, there is almost nothing as important as knowing how to build, manage, and leverage social capital. Here is your primer.

1. What is Social Capital
Financial capital refers to money and items that can be used to produce goods and services. Social capital refers to the network of relationships which you can deploy to get things done. Importantly, it is not just a measure of quantity or the number of relationships you have, but a measure of density – how thick and meaningful your relationships are – and a measure of deployability – how willing to work on your behalf those relationships are.

People who study social capital have often put it into two different groups. “Bonding Capital” has classically referred to the strength of relationships and willingness to help and share within a community such as a neighborhood or a club, while “Bridging Capital” has referred to the strength of connections between different groups of people. In the connected world of today’s internet, “social capital” tends to refer more generally to the strength and density of your social networks.

2. How do you build it?
Social capital is built over time by investing in relationships with people already in your network and building new relationships with people outside. “Investing in relationships” can mean many things, but at it’s core, harking back to a theme that comes up often on this blog, means finding ways to proactively be helpful for people and meet their needs. It’s worth noting, for example, that Ron Conway is reputed to proactively seek out how he can be helpful, rather than just waiting for people to tell him what they need.

Interestingly, social capital is less like a physical resource that becomes depleted as you use it, and more like a muscle that gets stronger the more you exercise it. If I introduce developer A to company B, and their relationship blooms, my social capital doesn’t decrease for having “used it” to make the connection; it increases for having provided each party with a valuable resource in one another.

Importantly, social capital is not just about the ability to connect to people. This skill is becoming increasingly commodified as new technology makes it easier than ever to visualize our social graph. Social capital is also a measure of the influence and reputation which you can bring to that connection, which has direct implications for the likelihood that the parties you’re connecting will actually invest in the new relationship you’re bridging. In this sense it’s also a measure of your power of self-fulfilling prophecy.

Finally, social capital is not a transaction. It is not something you can buy, and not a system where reciprocity always comes in the form of getting help and resources directly from the people you’ve helped. It is much more karmic, and the more you give, the more you ultimately receive, even if from a totally different person or group.

3. How do you use it?
Quite simply put, you use your social capital to find the things you need, whether it’s a new apartment in the city you’re moving to, a new employee for your startup or, as I learned a little more than a year ago, help funding your rescue dog’s ACL surgery. One of the most important things to realize about social capital is that the fact that you likely don’t know what you’re going to need (and there how you’re going to have to deploy your social capital) suggests that the best general strategy for building and using it is to help a wide array of people with as much vigor as you can muster, rather than assuming you know exactly the few targets that you need to focus on at the exclusion of others.

4. How do you lose it?
Like financial capital, you can lose social capital, although it’s usually a more subtle and long-term process. You can overtax relationships by not understanding how willing to help you or interested in your help certain relationships are. You can certainly misfire and make an introduction that goes so wrong it sours a relationship. But in general, there is an almost 1:1 correlation between the things that make you not a great person in general and the things that diminish your social capital: deceit, inauthenticity, duplicity. These are the things that kill your reputation and credibility and make people not want to go out on a limb for you.

5. Who are examples of people that do it best?
Each of us has a few people we can think of who are constantly making things happen by tapping into their networks. My mind immediately jumps to people like Nicole Patrice Johnson, a tech and social entrepreneurship superconnector extraordinaire, Unreasonable Institute cofounder Teju Ravilochan, and Mike Del Ponte, founder of Sparkseed and now Marketing Manager at BranchOut. These are the type of people who surprise me with new connections constantly. Each industry has certain people – such as Ron Conway mentioned above, or someone like GoodCapital and Hub Bay Area founder Kevin Jones in the social enterprise space – who have a reputation for how effectively they use social capital to help the people they care about (and ultimately, help themselves, as well). What’s an equally or even more interesting question is what are the settings, tools, and convening that do the best job at amplifying and enabling people to build social capital. This is a topic we’ll be exploring much more in the coming weeks and months.

6. Who needs it?
At the end of the day, we all need social capital. We all need networks of trusted relationships that can support us and channel new opportunities to us when we’re down, that can speak on our behalf and get our foot in the door, that can help us more efficiently and effectively navigate our professional lives.

While this sort of behavior is sometimes just lumped together as “networking,” it’s really much more than that. It’s a neverending process of weaving goodwill and willingness to help across your network, and finding ways to bind it ever tighter through your proactive contributions to it. The central activity is not ultimately, to get, but to give. Only in giving more can you assure that when you need something, you’ll be able to find it.

Social capital is not just the coming decade’s most important buzzword. It is one of, if not the most important currency in our highly-networked world. Knowing how to build and use social capital is one of if not the most important skill for modern professionals. Having tools to mange and leverage social capital…well, we’re convinced that they’re the single most important set of tools still waiting to be created. If you agree, sign up for our beta. And even if not, take a little time to read some of the recommended reading below.

7. Further reading
As you’ll notice, most of these titles focus on the community development and civic engagement space. That’s because while business writers have spent the last couple decades peddling tips about handshakes and follow-up emails, these folks have been researching how social capital helps people survive in existential situations. There is a huge amount the business world can learn from them.
“Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community” – Robert Putnam. The book that introduced “social capital” to the masses.
“Building Communities from the Inside Out” – John McKnight and John Kretzmann. The most important handbook for helping communities uncover social capital resources.
“Here Comes Everybody” and “Cognitive Surplus” – Clay Shirky. While not specifically about social capital, these are the stories of how organizing and sharing is changing in the digital age, and are ultimately the story of how the groups for whom we deploy our network of resources and from whom we can tap into a network of resources are changing.

Photo via Wired

  • http://www.SiliconPrairieNews.com/ Jeff Slobotski

    Another great post Nathaniel…

    Some good points and reminders for us not to wait for the request for help to be made, but to proactively figure out how to help our network.

    Great reading list as well!

  • Kevindoylejones

    Nice piece. Thanks for the mention. And for reminding me you need to meet Cory smith our new CEO for socap and the hub. And do you know Penelope douglas who is our new working board president?

  • http://OnTheSpiral.com/ GregoryJRader

    Great stuff Nathaniel,
    I have been working on a post contrasting the benefits of social capital vs financial capital. The idea is inspired by a post by Venkat Rao discussing the financial management practices of the very poor (http://www.ribbonfarm.com/2010/11/16/what-entrepreneurs-can-learn-from-the-poor/), particularly the following quotes:

    “The big insight in the book is the extent to which the cash-flow management solution is a social, rather than individual.

    But the sophistication of organic financial systems among the poor comes at a cost. They put enormous strain on reserves of social capital. To make the mechanisms work, the poor are forced to trust each other far more than we rich people do. And like us, they are ordinary human beings, who’d rather not deal with unpleasant neighbors or annoying relatives more than they must. The social burden is bad enough that the poor often forgo even food, rather than have to deal with the mechanisms available to them.”

    It occurs to me that social capital and financial capital are not just two different ways of getting access to things we need but actually provide benefits in quite different ways. Social capital draws us together, makes us more resilient but also more dependent. As you note:

    “It’s a neverending process of weaving goodwill and willingness to help across your network, and finding ways to bind it ever tighter through your proactive contributions to it.”

    Financial capital on the other hand is more anti-social but also allows us to act more autonomously. If you are over-reliant on social capital it becomes much more difficult to take risks. Venkat’s post illustrates this beautifully…for the people he describes it would be almost impossible to take a significant entrepreneurial risk because their entire familial and social networks are intimately effected by their fortunes.

    I wonder to what extent technological innovations that make social capital more “liquid” affect this dynamic. Does frictionless communication and group formation allow us to take more risks with social capital knowing we can recover from the occasional mistake, or do the persistence and frictionless distribution of reputation make mistakes even more damaging?

    I would love to hear your thoughts…

    Greg

  • http://blog.assetmap.com Nathaniel Whittemore

    Social capital vs. Financial capital – such an amazing discussion to have.

    I think there are a couple things that are really important to note in this conversation.

    1. Financial capital thrives for a reason: it creates an opportunity to harness specialized labor and comparative advantage from complete strangers. That’s an amazingly powerful force, and one that has netted huge benefits for society.

    2. One of the challenges of the way social capital is being used in the scenario mentioning above is that it’s really, ultimately not being used as social capital, but as a proxy for financial capital collateral. That’s the thing that makes it such a strained situation – if there wasn’t that pressure that your social capital was now committed in the service of opening up an opportunity to access financial capital – people would simply disengage with the people whom they didn’t particularly enjoy. This collateralization of social capital has that as an unintended consequence.

    3. I actually wouldn’t be surprised if you see versions of this “collateralized social capital” over the next decade or two in even highly advanced economies. For example, I have a relatively poor credit score (whoops entrepreneurship), but an extensive network that would ensure that if I ever got into real trouble, I would have a huge amount of people to back me up. There is something appealing about the idea of using that as a way to get a loan, but man, doesn’t that complicate things?

    My instinct is that these are issues we’re going to have to continue to wait and see what happens as real life situations put them to the test.

  • http://blog.assetmap.com Nathaniel Whittemore

    I haven’t met either of them – but would love to

  • http://blog.assetmap.com Nathaniel Whittemore

    Thanks Jeff – have you read any of those? I think you’d really like em!

  • http://www.facebook.com/kylewestaway Kyle Westaway

    Another interesting resource for this approach to building social capital is the book “Never Eat Alone”

  • http://OnTheSpiral.com/ GregoryJRader

    Lot’s of good stuff there…

    1. Great point and very well said…and this point creates a bridge to the Dunbar number debate…the relative advantages of financial capital have much to do with how scalable social capital becomes.

    2. Agree that ‘conversion points’ between social and financial capital get complicated, but I think the point still applies to pure social capital situations. People commonly find themselves in situations where they might prefer not to be obligated to a particular person but rely on that person for access to opportunity. At the most basic level consider the person who wants to follow a dream but whose family pushes him in a more prestigious or traditional direction. That family influence derives its power from the implied obligation to reciprocate the family’s past social capital contributions.

    3. Interesting example. As social capital becomes more explicit we will certainly see more efforts to convert into financial capital. There are however, more subtle versions of this that are very common now. You frequently hear that angel investors and early stage VCs don’t invest in the product, they invest in the team. That team (and anyone who vouches for them) then is putting their social capital on the line in exchange for investment.

    Curiously though, the cultural expectations in that context have evolved to limit the risk of damaging social capital. Is this a wealth effect – VCs can afford to take losses and are prepared for it? How will cultural expectations in other contexts evolve as social capital becomes more prevalent?

    btw – just finished the post I mentioned in the last comment, if you get a chance any feedback would be much appreciated: http://onthespiral.com/should-you-actively-balancing-portfolio-social-financial-capital

  • http://blog.assetmap.com Nathaniel Whittemore

    Thinking about your second point, I wonder if there is a difference between “inherited” vs. “created” social capital. In your example you’re talking about inherited capital from family obligations, which is definitely a real, powerful, and not necessarily great force. Interesting.

    In terms of your point three about VCs, the question to me is how much social capital is really on the line when someone like an advisor introduces a VC to a prospective investment. Definitely some..you don’t want to build a reputation for wasting peoples time with bad leads, but ultimately, there’s not a lot of risk.

    Look forward to checking out your post.

  • http://twitter.com/aunnie Aunnie Patton

    Really enjoy this post! I love how this expounds upon one of my favorite posts this year (For Gen Y, There Are No Weak Ties, Only Ties That Aren’t Strong Yet). As a young professional it’s easy to feel intimidated when you are trying to build your network (especially when it comes to people who have been in the space longer than you’ve been alive!), so it’s great to have encouragement and substantive commentary to look to.

  • Baruffi Francesco

    A friend of mine has given me that book. It’s wonderful.I agree with you Kyle!

  • http://twitter.com/fbaruffi Francesco Baruffi

    Very interesting post!!! Thanks!!

  • http://twitter.com/RalfLippold Ralf Lippold

    It’s all about stories, http://de.justin.tv/startupschool/b/272178470 – thanks Ron for sharing your insights.

blog comments powered by Disqus

site tracking with Asynchronous Google Analytics plugin for Multisite by WordPress Expert at Web Design Jakarta.